I've been thinking a lot lately about the idea of control and spanking. People often talk about the loss of control they feel when they are spanked and the appeal of that loss of control. However, I've never really had that loss of control. I always know the spanking is something I agreed to. Maybe not that specific one, but in general I agreed to do or not do whatever and the consequences for doing or not doing whatever. That I can stop it at any moment, but chose not to even though it hurts a ton.
I suppose it's something I'm more curious about than anything. The only times I've ever felt a real loss of control, it's been the few times A. and I have played "Master and slave" and then it's been a horrible feeling, despite being very aroused when we talk about it doing it. Like what I used to feel with my stepfather. So, we're going to change some of the ways we play so I don't end up in that headspace.
But I guess I wonder about it in terms of that feeling of being little -- that Natty part of me -- that I really do like. Do I reach that little feeling better when I'm not in control like an adult? If so, then I how do I do that?
I suppose I always approach spanking as an adult, even though the appeal of it has to do with feeling like a child. Of being able to be this childlike part of me that rarely gets to come out. Yet, I need to approach it as an adult in order to protect that childlike part of me.
Plus, well, there's a lot about being an adult that I like. I remember a few years ago I was standing on a curb next to a mother and her child waiting to cross the street. The mother told her child that they couldn't cross the street because the big orange hand was up. I looked to my right and left and noticing that there wasn't a car coming, went ahead and crossed the street. "Mommy, why is she crossing the street?" the kid asked. I chuckled to myself and thought, because I'm a grown-up and I can.
Or the other night when I was in a chat room with a friend while I was watching "South Park." She happens to think it's um...well, not the most edifying show and as she switches, suggested maybe "mother" should come in and make me stop or else. I laughed and said "oh, I'd just leave then."
Yeah, I don't really like someone controlling my viewing habits either.
I dunno. I suppose having been a parent of sorts, I don't believe parenting is about controlling children, but about providing a safe environment that allows them grow as human beings. For my stepfather, it was all about control. And I suppose when it comes to being that child-like part of me, the adult part of me doesn't really want her to be controlled but to grow as a human being.
Though, I suppose there is also the appeal of an all-wise parental figure, sorta like the tradition of the spiritual father/mother we have in the Eastern Orthodox/Byzantine Church telling me what to do and following him or her regardless. But then, they don't really make good partners for, um, other things...
I do think there's still an element of the adult-me taking over during a spanking when I really need to let that Natty part of me be the one getting spanked. I guess you could say that in subtle ways I can be a real control freak.
Hence my utter wonder at the whole "losing control" thing.
Thursday, December 01, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




3 comments:
"the tradition of the spiritual father/mother we have in the Eastern Orthodox/Byzantine Church telling me what to do and following him or her regardless...."
But that's an abuse of the Orhtoodx teaching, not what it actually is. It isn't a "guru" relationship, but one of freedom. Any priest who demands obedience isn't acting according to the Orthodox teaching.
Karl -
The problem with my wording in that paragraph is that I implied that it was somehow different than what I explained in the paragraph above, when in reality the relationship with a spiritual father/mother is the same. The spiritual father/mother does not seek to control his or her spiritual child, but in the words of Bishop Kallistos, "to assist him to see the truth for himself; not to suppress a man's personality, but to enable him to discover himself, to grow to full maturity and to become what he really is."
However, for the spirtual father to do this requires absolute obedience from his spiritual child and that was the appeal of which I spoke. While the eventual fruit is indeed freedom, it only comes after strict adhearence to the words of the spiritual father/mother. "But what of the spiritual child? How does he contribute to the mutual relationship between father and son in God?" asks Bishop Kallistos. "Briefly, what he offers is his full and unquestioning obedience."
And in fact, the analogy with a guru is actually quite apt as guru is a Sanskrit word for teacher and in Hinduism exists in the same role. Indeed, even Bishop Kallistos uses it in the above link discussing the spiritual father in Orthodox Christianity. Unfortunately, it gets misunderstood in our culture as a sort of cultish figure, which certainly dos NOT describe what a spiritual father/mother is.
Haron --
Yep, I'm the same way. The roles I'll play will be of those who don't have control and indeed, if given any bit of choice (well, except maybe during ageplay) it totally throws the scene for me.
So, maybe when people talk about "loss of control" it's a sort of simulated loss of control and I just take it too literally?
Post a Comment